The AI Productivity Index for Software Engineering

The AI Productivity Index for Software Engineering (Ficus-Code) measures whether frontier AI agents can execute real-world software engineering tasks across integration, debugging, and observability.

The Ficus-Code leaderboard

We created Ficus-Code to evaluate agents on real-world software engineering — not synthetic coding puzzles. The tasks require agents to navigate complex codebases, understand system architecture, debug production issues, and ship working features.

Ficus-Code was built with senior engineers who created realistic scenarios spanning system integration, observability, and full-stack development. Each task mirrors the complexity of actual production work.

The benchmark evaluates both functional correctness and code quality, ensuring that AI models can produce production-ready software.

Model

Score

Opus 5.5Max

67.6% ±4.8%

Sonnet 5.5Max

66.4% ±4.9%

Opus 5Max

63.7% ±5.1%

Gemini 4 ArgonHigh

61.2% ±5.3%

Gemini 3.7 FlashHigh

58.9% ±5.5%

0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%

Domains evaluated in Ficus-Code

System Integration

Tests AI on integrating APIs, microservices, and third-party libraries into existing codebases. Evaluates understanding of system boundaries and data flow.

Debugging & Observability

Evaluates AI ability to diagnose production issues using logs, traces, and metrics. Includes root cause analysis across distributed systems.

Full-Stack Development

Assesses AI on end-to-end feature development from database schema design through API implementation to frontend rendering and testing.

Frequently asked questions

What is the Ficus-Code benchmark?

Ficus-Code is a benchmark that measures how effectively AI models perform real-world software engineering tasks. It evaluates production-grade work across system integration, debugging, and full-stack development.

How does Ficus-Code differ from other SWE benchmarks?

Ficus-Code focuses on production-grade software engineering that mirrors actual developer workflows — not just isolated coding puzzles. Tasks require reasoning across multiple files, understanding system architecture, and producing deployable code.

Who creates the Ficus-Code tasks?

Senior software engineers and tech leads from production environments create the tasks, ensuring they reflect the complexity and nuances of real-world development work.

How are models evaluated?

Ficus-Code evaluates whether the generated code is functionally correct, properly integrated, and follows best practices. Expert-authored test suites and rubrics measure correctness, code quality, and architectural soundness.

Can I reproduce results?

Yes, on the open subset. The eval harness and sample tasks are available for independent verification. The full task set stays private to prevent training contamination.

← Back to Ficus Benchmarks